↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic in the environment: Biology and Chemistry

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
504 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
487 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arsenic in the environment: Biology and Chemistry
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, April 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.037
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prosun Bhattacharya, Alan H. Welch, Kenneth G. Stollenwerk, Mike J. McLaughlin, Jochen Bundschuh, G. Panaullah

Abstract

Arsenic (As) distribution and toxicology in the environment is a serious issue, with millions of individuals worldwide being affected by As toxicosis. Sources of As contamination are both natural and anthropogenic and the scale of contamination ranges from local to regional. There are many areas of research that are being actively pursued to address the As contamination problem. These include new methods of screening for As in the field, determining the epidemiology of As in humans, and identifying the risk of As uptake in agriculture. Remediation of As-affected water supplies is important and research includes assessing natural remediation potential as well as phytoremediation. Another area of active research is on the microbially mediated biogeochemical interactions of As in the environment. In 2005, a conference was convened to bring together scientists involved in many of the different areas of As research. In this paper, we present a synthesis of the As issues in the light of long-standing research and with regards to the new findings presented at this conference. This contribution provides a backdrop to the issues raised at the conference together with an overview of contemporary and historical issues of As contamination and health impacts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 469 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 104 21%
Student > Master 73 15%
Researcher 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 7%
Other 78 16%
Unknown 94 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 103 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 9%
Chemistry 41 8%
Engineering 35 7%
Other 72 15%
Unknown 127 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,471,900
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#7,194
of 29,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,422
of 78,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#9
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.