↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Recent channel changes of the Jiangsu reach of the Yangtze river: an investigation from multi-temporal digital elevation models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Coastal Conservation, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: Recent channel changes of the Jiangsu reach of the Yangtze river: an investigation from multi-temporal digital elevation models
Published in
Journal of Coastal Conservation, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11852-017-0541-5
Authors

Shibiao Bai, Ping Lu, Jian Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Decision Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#313
of 470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,662
of 318,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Coastal Conservation
#16
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 470 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.