↓ Skip to main content

Macroparasite Infections of Amphibians: What Can They Tell Us?

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Macroparasite Infections of Amphibians: What Can They Tell Us?
Published in
EcoHealth, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10393-012-0785-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet Koprivnikar, David J. Marcogliese, Jason R. Rohr, Sarah A. Orlofske, Thomas R. Raffel, Pieter T. J. Johnson

Abstract

Understanding linkages between environmental changes and disease emergence in human and wildlife populations represents one of the greatest challenges to ecologists and parasitologists. While there is considerable interest in drivers of amphibian microparasite infections and the resulting consequences, comparatively little research has addressed such questions for amphibian macroparasites. What work has been done in this area has largely focused on nematodes of the genus Rhabdias and on two genera of trematodes (Ribeiroia and Echinostoma). Here, we provide a synopsis of amphibian macroparasites, explore how macroparasites may affect amphibian hosts and populations, and evaluate the significance of these parasites in larger community and ecosystem contexts. In addition, we consider environmental influences on amphibian-macroparasite interactions by exploring contemporary ecological factors known or hypothesized to affect patterns of infection. While some macroparasites of amphibians have direct negative effects on individual hosts, no studies have explicitly examined whether such infections can affect amphibian populations. Moreover, due to their complex life cycles and varying degrees of host specificity, amphibian macroparasites have rich potential as bioindicators of environmental modifications, especially providing insights into changes in food webs. Because of their documented pathologies and value as bioindicators, we emphasize the need for broader investigation of this understudied group, noting that ecological drivers affecting these parasites may also influence disease patterns in other aquatic fauna.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Finland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Other 10 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 45%
Environmental Science 25 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,209,953
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#353
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,422
of 164,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.