| Title |
Improved contact lens electrode for corneal ERG recordings in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, May 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-004-5734-1 |
| Authors |
Botir Sagdullaev, Paul DeMarco, Maureen McCall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2013.
All research outputs
#4,761,657
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#28
of 461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,752
of 58,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 461 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them