↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of triglycerides by consecutive chromatographic techniques. II. Ucuhuba kernel fat

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS), November 1965
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of triglycerides by consecutive chromatographic techniques. II. Ucuhuba kernel fat
Published in
Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS), November 1965
DOI 10.1007/bf02632458
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. W. Culp, R. D. Harlow, Carter Litchfield, Raymond Reiser

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#979
of 3,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#408
of 1,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society (JAOCS)
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.