| Title |
Development of a software tool for computation of parenteral nutrition in adults, and its potential role in improving nutritional care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-006-9053-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Paschidi, Maria Skouroliakou, Fotis Archontovassilis, Petros Papassarantopoulos, Sophia L. Markantonis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,216
of 166,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.