↓ Skip to main content

The use of microfluorometric method for activity-guided isolation of antiplasmodial compound from plant extracts

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The use of microfluorometric method for activity-guided isolation of antiplasmodial compound from plant extracts
Published in
Parasitology Research, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00436-008-0879-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. N. Shuaibu, P. A. Wuyep, T. Yanagi, K. Hirayama, T. Tanaka, I. Kouno

Abstract

In vitro antiplasmodial activity of methanolic extracts of 16 medicinal plants was evaluated by fluorometric assay using PicoGreen. The IC50s, as determined by parasite DNA concentration, ranged from <11 to >200 and <13 to >200 microg/ml for Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 and K1, respectively; and the most active extracts were those from Anogeissus leiocarpus and Terminalia avicennoides (<11-> or =14 microg/ml). Aqueous, butanolic, ethyl acetate, and methanolic fractions of these two extracts revealed butanolic fraction to have a relatively better activity (IC50, 10-12 microg/ml). Activity-guided chromatographic separation of the butanolic fraction on Sephadex LH-20 followed by nuclear magnetic resonance and correlation high-performance liquid chromatography revealed the presence of known hydrolysable tannins and some related compounds-castalagin, ellagic acid, flavogallonic acid, punicalagin, terchebulin, and two other fractions. The IC50s of all these compounds ranged between 8-21 microg/ml (8-40 microM) against both the strains. Toxicity assay with mouse fibroblasts showed all the extracts and isolated compounds to have IC50 > or = 1500 microg/ml, except for Momordica balsamina with <1500 microg/l. All the extracts and isolated compounds did not affect the integrity of human erythrocyte membrane at the observed IC50s. However, adverse effects manifest in a concentration-dependent fashion (from IC50 > or = 500 microg/ml).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 36%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 23%
Chemistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#621
of 3,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,490
of 155,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.