↓ Skip to main content

Demographic influences on the behavior of chimpanzees

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
Title
Demographic influences on the behavior of chimpanzees
Published in
Primates, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10329-005-0139-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C. Mitani

Abstract

Recent research has revealed substantial diversity in the behavior of wild chimpanzees. Understanding the sources of this variation has become a central focus of investigation. While genetic, ecological, and cultural factors are often invoked to explain behavioral variation in chimpanzees, the demographic context is sometimes overlooked as a contributing factor. Observations of chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda, reveal that the size and structure of the unit group or community can both facilitate and constrain the manifestation of behavior. With approximately 150 individuals, the Ngogo community is much larger than others that have been studied in the wild. We have taken advantage of the unusual demographic structure of this community to document new and intriguing patterns of chimpanzee behavior with respect to hunting, territoriality, and male social relationships. Chimpanzees at Ngogo hunt often and with a considerable degree of success. In addition, male chimpanzees there frequently patrol the boundary of their territory and engage in repeated bouts of lethal intergroup aggression. By forming two distinct subgroups, male chimpanzees at Ngogo also develop social bonds above the level of dyadic pairs. While the sheer number of chimpanzees contributes to differences in hunting, patrolling, mating, and subgrouping at Ngogo, the demographic situation may also constrain behavioral interactions. At Ngogo, male chimpanzees who are closely related genetically through the maternal line do not appear to affiliate or cooperate with each other. Demographic constraints may be responsible for this finding. In this paper, I use these examples to illustrate how the demographic context affects the possible range of behavioral options open to individuals and ultimately contributes to the explanation of behavioral diversity in chimpanzees.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 183 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Researcher 38 19%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 51%
Environmental Science 18 9%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Psychology 15 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 17 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#470
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,913
of 60,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them