| Title |
Genetic modification of Bluetongue virus by uptake of "synthetic" genome segments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-7-261 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
René GP van Gennip, Daniel Veldman, Sandra GP van de Water, Piet A van Rijn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#911
of 3,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,515
of 99,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.