↓ Skip to main content

The effective visual field in reading Chinese

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, October 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
The effective visual field in reading Chinese
Published in
Reading and Writing, October 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1008043900392
Authors

Hsuan-Chih Chen, Chi-Kong Tang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 43%
Linguistics 3 21%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#160
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,823
of 32,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them