You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Polynomial Time Array Dataflow Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 27 |
| Book title |
Languages and Compilers for Parallel Computing
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, August 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-35767-x_27 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-004029-3, 978-3-54-035767-4
|
| Authors |
Robert Seater, David Wonnacott, Seater, Robert, Wonnacott, David |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 83% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 11% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,486
of 8,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,669
of 38,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.