↓ Skip to main content

The lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus capsid protein is a nuclear–cytoplasmic protein

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
The lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus capsid protein is a nuclear–cytoplasmic protein
Published in
Archives of Virology, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00705-009-0410-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hakimeh Mohammadi, Shayan Sharif, Raymond R. Rowland, Dongwan Yoo

Abstract

Arteriviruses replicate in the cytoplasm and do not require the nucleus function for virus multiplication in vitro. However, nucleocapsid (N) protein of two arteriviruses, porcine reproductive respiratory syndrome virus and equine arteritis virus, has been observed to localize in the nucleus and nucleolus of virus-infected and N-gene-transfected cells in addition to their normal cytoplasmic distribution. In the present study, the N protein of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV) of mice was examined for nuclear localization. The subcellular localization of LDV-N was determined by tagging N with enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) at the N- and C-terminus. Both N-EGFP and EGFP-N fusion proteins localized to the nucleus and nucleolus of gene-transfected cells. Labeled N also accumulated in the perinuclear region, the site of virus replication. The LDV-N sequence contains a putative 'pat4'-type nuclear localization signal (NLS) consisting of 38-KKKK. To determine its functional significance, a series of deletion constructs of N were generated and individually expressed in cells. The results showed that the 'pat4' NLS was essential for nuclear translocation. In addition, the LDV-N interacted with the importin-alpha and -beta proteins, suggesting that the LDV-N nuclear localization may occur via the importin-mediated nuclear transport pathway. These results provide further evidence for the nuclear localization of N as a common feature within the arteriviruses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Professor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#916
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,119
of 112,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.