| Title |
Investigating the Effect of Polymeric Approaches on Circulation Time and Physical Properties of Nanobubbles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11095-010-0247-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa C. du Toit, Thirumala Govender, Viness Pillay, Yahya E. Choonara, Tetsuya Kodama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 10 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#1,023
of 2,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,095
of 183,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#17
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.