You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/mrm.24743 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Hansen, Torben E. Lund, Ryan Sangill, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Engineering | 16 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#2,761
of 7,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,483
of 209,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#30
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.