↓ Skip to main content

A comparative study of the effects of carbamazepine and the NMDA receptor antagonist remacemide on road tracking and car-following performance in actual traffic

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A comparative study of the effects of carbamazepine and the NMDA receptor antagonist remacemide on road tracking and car-following performance in actual traffic
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/s002130100898
Authors

J. Ramaekers, C. Lamers, F. Verhey, N. Muntjewerff, E. Mobbs, N. Sanders, J. Lewis, J. Lockton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Psychology 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,099
of 5,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,744
of 41,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.