↓ Skip to main content

Position-dependent expression of GADD45α in rat brain tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Position-dependent expression of GADD45α in rat brain tumours
Published in
Medical Oncology, June 2007
DOI 10.1007/s12032-007-0025-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Brú, Carlos del Fresno, Alessandra Soares-Schanoski, Sonia Albertos, Isabel Brú, Amelia Porres, Eduardo Rollán-Landeras, Ana Dopazo, David Casero, Vanesa Gómez-Piña, Lourdes García, Francisco Arnalich, Rebeca Alvarez, Alexandro Rodríguez-Rojas, Pablo Fuentes-Prior, Eduardo López-Collazo

Abstract

Although the complex and multifactorial process of tumour growth has been extensively studied for decades, our understanding of the fundamental relationship between tumour growth dynamics and genetic expression profile remains incomplete. Recent studies of tumour dynamics indicate that gene expression in solid tumours would depend on the distance from the centre of the tumour. Since tumour proliferative activity is mainly localised to its external zone, and taking into account that generation and expansion of genetic mutations depend on the number of cell divisions, important differences in gene expression between central and peripheral sections of the same tumour are to be expected. Here, we have studied variations in the genetic expression profile between peripheral and internal samples of the same brain tumour. We have carried out microarray analysis of mRNA expression, and found a differential profile of genetic expression between the two cell subsets. In particular, one major nuclear protein that regulates cell responses to DNA-damaging and stress signals, GADD45alpha, was expressed at much lower levels in the peripheral zone, as compared to tumour core samples. These differences in GADD45alpha mRNA transcription levels have been confirmed by quantitative analysis via real time PCR, and protein levels of GADD45alpha also exhibit the same pattern of differential expression. Our findings suggest that GADD45alpha might play a major role in the regulation of brain tumour invasive potential.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 50%
Librarian 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Mathematics 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#261
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,843
of 69,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.