↓ Skip to main content

Continuous versus intermittent endotracheal cuff pressure control for the prevention of ventilator-associated respiratory infections in Vietnam: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Continuous versus intermittent endotracheal cuff pressure control for the prevention of ventilator-associated respiratory infections in Vietnam: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-2587-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vu Quoc Dat, Ronald B. Geskus, Marcel Wolbers, Huynh Thi Loan, Lam Minh Yen, Nguyen Thien Binh, Le Thanh Chien, Nguyen Thi Hoang Mai, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Nguyen Phu Huong Lan, Nguyen Van Hao, Hoang Bao Long, Tran Phuong Thuy, Nguyen Van Kinh, Nguyen Vu Trung, Vu Dinh Phu, Nguyen Trung Cap, Dao Tuyet Trinh, James Campbell, Evelyne Kestelyn, Heiman F. L. Wertheim, Duncan Wyncoll, Guy Edward Thwaites, H. Rogier van Doorn, C. Louise Thwaites, Behzad Nadjm

Abstract

Ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI) comprises ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis (VAT). Although their diagnostic criteria vary, together these are the most common hospital-acquired infections in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide, responsible for a large proportion of antibiotic use within ICUs. Evidence-based strategies for the prevention of VARI in resource-limited settings are lacking. Preventing the leakage of oropharyngeal secretions into the lung using continuous endotracheal cuff pressure control is a promising strategy. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of automated, continuous endotracheal cuff pressure control in preventing the development of VARI and reducing antibiotic use in ICUs in Vietnam. This is an open-label randomised controlled multicentre trial. We will enrol 600 adult patients intubated for ≤ 24 h at the time of enrolment. Eligible patients will be stratified according to admission diagnosis (180 tetanus, 420 non-tetanus) and site and will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either (1) automated, continuous control of endotracheal cuff pressure or (2) intermittent measurement and control of endotracheal cuff pressure using a manual cuff pressure meter. The primary outcome is the occurrence of VARI, defined as either VAP or VAT during the ICU admission up to a maximum of 90 days after randomisation. Patients in both groups who are at risk for VARI will receive a standardised battery of investigations if their treating physician feels a new infection has occurred, the results of which will be used by an endpoint review committee, blinded to the allocated arm and independent of patient care, to determine the primary outcome. All enrolled patients will be followed for mortality and endotracheal tube cuff-related complications at 28 days and 90 days after randomisation. Other secondary outcomes include antibiotic use; days ventilated, in ICU and in hospital; inpatient mortality; costs of antibiotics in ICU; duration of ICU stay; and duration of hospital stay. This study will provide high-quality evidence concerning the use of continuous endotracheal cuff pressure control as a method to reduce VARI, antibiotic use and hospitalisation costs and to shorten stay. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02966392 . Registered on November 9, 2016. Protocol version: 2.0; issue date March 3, 2017.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 40 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Unspecified 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 44 38%