| Title |
Chinese spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chloroplast genome: Complete sequence and contig clones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02823995 |
| Authors |
Yasunari Ogihara, Kazuriho Isono, Toshio Kojima, Akira Endo, Mitsumasa Hanaoka, Takashi Shiina, Toru Terachi, Shigeko Utsugi, Minoru Murata, Naoki Mori, Shigeo Takumi, Kazuho Ikeo, Takashi Gojobori, Rika Murai, Koji Murai, Yoshihiro Matsuoka, Yukari Ohnishi, Hikaru Tajiri, Koichiro Tsunewaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
#105
of 399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,320
of 191,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
#17
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.