↓ Skip to main content

Palliative sedation in advanced cancer patients hospitalized in a specialized palliative care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Palliative sedation in advanced cancer patients hospitalized in a specialized palliative care unit
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00520-018-4164-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago Parra Palacio, Clara Elisa Giraldo Hoyos, Camilo Arias Rodríguez, Daniel Mejía Arrieta, John Jairo Vargas Gómez, Alicia Krikorian

Abstract

To describe the practice of palliative sedation (PS) in patients with advanced cancer in a specialized palliative care (PC) unit in Colombia. Descriptive prospective study including all adults with cancer hospitalized under PS in a cancer institute between January and July 2015 in Colombia. Variables examined were diagnosis, physical functioning, symptoms at the start of sedation, medications and dosages used, and type, level, and time of sedation. Descriptive and correlational statistics were obtained. Sixty-six patients were included, 70% of which were women. The patients had an average age of 61 years (range 24-87), and 74% had a Karnofsky Index (KI) of 50% or less. The most frequent diagnosis was breast cancer (22%), and 82% had metastatic cancer. The prevalence of palliative sedation was 2% and the most common symptoms indicating it were dyspnea (59%), delirium (45%), and pain (32%). All patients received midazolam as a sedative. The average time between the interval start and culmination of sedation was 44 h. There was a significant and inverse relationship between functionality and time under sedation. Palliative sedation is a valid therapeutic option for refractory symptoms causing suffering. The results correspond to international reports and guidelines, which suggests that PS is tailored to the needs of the individual patient while maintaining a high scientific standard, even in a context where PC is under development. However, further development of strategies and clear indications towards the use of PS in Colombia are needed, given its still scarce use.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 7 8%
Lecturer 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 27 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 28%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,229,237
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#973
of 4,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,008
of 329,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#30
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.