↓ Skip to main content

Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Pneumonia, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review
Published in
Pneumonia, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirotaka Nakashima, Kazuhisa Watanabe, Hiroyuki Umegaki, Yusuke Suzuki, Masafumi Kuzuya

Abstract

Pneumonia is a very common disease, especially among the elderly. Various drugs' preventive effects against pneumonia have been reported. The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is used to prevent pneumonia, but the robustness of its efficacy is unclear. This review estimates the effectiveness of cilostazol for preventing pneumonia in elderly individuals. The following databases were searched from the earliest record to January 2016, without language restriction (the secondary search was conducted on February 2017): MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web. Studies were included if they were published randomized controlled trials investigating the preventive effect of cilostazol on pneumonia in the elderly. The outcome was the incidence of pneumonia. Two trials were identified that met the search criteria (1423 participants). Both trials compared cilostazol with no antiplatelet in patients with a history of cerebral infarction. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the small number of trials and the heterogeneity of the data. Both trials suggested that cilostazol reduced the incidence of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.73 in one trial, RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.69 in the other) and the recurrence of cerebral infarction (0.43; 0.21-0.90, 0.53; 0.34-0.81, respectively). The quality of evidence provided by the trials was very low, mainly because of the high risk of bias. It is difficult to draw conclusions on the basis of two trials. Moreover, in the two trials, cilostazol could have reduced the incidence of pneumonia via a reduction of the recurrence of cerebral infarction, which suggests that other antiplatelets could also have the same effects. Stronger evidence is required from large trials assessing the effectiveness of cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia. PROSPERO (CRD42016036724).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 11 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 12 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,354,637
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Pneumonia
#57
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,446
of 329,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pneumonia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.