↓ Skip to main content

Cutting the cord: virtual machines for real instrumental analysis not just at the instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Cutting the cord: virtual machines for real instrumental analysis not just at the instrument
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-0963-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosina M. Georgiadis, Kristina Streu, Norman C. Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,393,794
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,278
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,574
of 351,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#52
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.