↓ Skip to main content

Role of natural killer cells in lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Role of natural killer cells in lung cancer
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00432-018-2635-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ozge Nur Aktaş, Ayşe Bilge Öztürk, Baran Erman, Suat Erus, Serhan Tanju, Şükrü Dilege

Abstract

One of the key immune cells involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer is natural killer (NK) cells and these cells are novel targets for therapeutic applications in lung cancer. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current literature on lung cancer pathogenesis with a focus on the interaction between NK cells and smoking, how these factors are related to the pathogenesis of lung cancer and how NK cell-based immunotherapy effect lung cancer survival. The relevant literature from PubMed and Medline databases is reviewed in this article. The cytolytic potential of NK cells are reduced in lung cancer and increasing evidence suggests that improving NK cell functioning may induce tumor regression. Recent clinical trials on NK cell-based novel therapies such as cytokines including interleukin (IL)-15, IL-12 and IL-2, NK-92 cell lines and allogenic NK cell immunotherapy showed promising results with less adverse effects on the lung cancer survival. The NK cell targeting strategy has not yet been approved for lung cancer treatment. More clinical studies focusing on the role of NK cells in lung cancer pathogenesis are warranted to develop novel NK cell-based therapeutic approaches for the treatment of lung cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 36 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,065,859
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1,277
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,924
of 330,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.