Title |
Cell-free generation of the Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) and APP-CTFγ
|
---|---|
Published in |
NeuroMolecular Medicine, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.1385/nmm:1:1:43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takeshi Ikeuchi, Sangram S. Sisodia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 6 | 32% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 26% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#139
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,779
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.