You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
1st MICCAI workshop on deep learning in medical image analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1080/21681163.2018.1457242 |
| Authors |
Gustavo Carneiro, João Manuel R. S. Tavares, Andrew P. Bradley, João Paulo Papa, Jacinto C. Nascimento, Jaime S. Cardoso, Zhi Lu, Vasileios Belagiannis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 21% |
| Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization
#148
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,241
of 343,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.