↓ Skip to main content

Effect of chiropractic treatment on primary or early secondary prevention: a systematic review with a pedagogic approach

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
86 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Effect of chiropractic treatment on primary or early secondary prevention: a systematic review with a pedagogic approach
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12998-018-0179-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Goncalves, Christine Le Scanff, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

Abstract

The chiropractic vitalistic approach to the concept of 'subluxation' as a cause of disease lacks both biological plausibility and possibly proof of validity. Nonetheless, some chiropractors purport to prevent disease in general through the use of chiropractic care. Evidence of its effect is needed to be allowed to continue this practice. The objective of this systematic review was therefore to investigate if there is any evidence that spinal manipulations/chiropractic care can be used in primary prevention (PP) and/or early secondary prevention in diseases other than musculoskeletal conditions. We searched PubMed, Embase, Index to Chiropractic Literature, and some specialized chiropractic journals, from inception to October 2017, using terms including: "chiropractic", "subluxation", "wellness", "prevention", "spinal manipulation", "mortality". Included were English language articles that indicated that they studied the clinical preventive effect of or benefit from manipulative therapy/chiropractic treatment in relation to PP and/or early treatment of physical diseases/morbidity in general, other than musculoskeletal disorders. Also, population studies were eligible. Checklists were designed in relation to the description of the reviewed articles and some basic quality criteria. Outcomes of studies were related to their methodological quality, disregarding results from those unable to answer the research questions on effect of treatment. Of the 13.099 titles scrutinized, 13 articles were included (eight clinical studies and five population studies). These studies dealt with various disorders of public health importance such as diastolic blood pressure, blood test immunological markers, and mortality. Only two clinical studies could be used for data synthesis. None showed any effect of spinal manipulation/chiropractic treatment. We found no evidence in the literature of an effect of chiropractic treatment in the scope of PP or early secondary prevention for disease in general. Chiropractors have to assume their role as evidence-based clinicians and the leaders of the profession must accept that it is harmful to the profession to imply a public health importance in relation to the prevention of such diseases through manipulative therapy/chiropractic treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 28%