↓ Skip to main content

Memory deficits in Alzheimer's patients: A comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, June 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
24 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Memory deficits in Alzheimer's patients: A comprehensive review
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, June 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01108841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni A. Carlesimo, Marlene Oscar-Berman

Abstract

Despite considerable experimental work on Alzheimer's disease (AD), the underlying cognitive mechanisms as well as the precise localization of neuropathological changes critical for memory loss remains undefined. A review of the neuropsychological literature on long-term memory deficits in AD patients suggests that AD patients display (a) a pervasive deficit of explicit memory, (b) a partial deficiency of implicit memory for verbal and visuoperceptual material (as measured by repetition priming procedures), and (c) a substantial sparing of implicit memory for visuomotor skills. The explicit memory loss is likely a result of encoding as well as consolidation difficulties. A faulty lexical-semantic knowledge structure appears responsible for deficient repetition priming effects. Since neuropathological changes diffusely affect the brain of AD patients, establishing a clear relationship between localization of cerebral lesions and memory deficits is particularly difficult. Nevertheless, data suggest that extensive involvement of the hippocampal-amygdala complex plays a major role in explicit memory loss. Damage to associative cortical areas likely is involved in repetition priming deficits. The relative integrity of primary motor and sensory cortical areas and of the basal ganglia likely subsume, by contrast, the normal learning of visuomotor skills.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 20%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 20%
Neuroscience 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,696,673
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#172
of 454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,329
of 19,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them