↓ Skip to main content

Both melatonin and meloxicam improved sleep and pain in females with primary dysmenorrhea—results from a double-blind cross-over intervention pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Both melatonin and meloxicam improved sleep and pain in females with primary dysmenorrhea—results from a double-blind cross-over intervention pilot study
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00737-018-0838-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farahnaz Keshavarzi, Fariba Mahmoudzadeh, Serge Brand, Dena Sadeghi Bahmani, Fariba Akbari, Habibolah Khazaie, Mohammad Rasoul Ghadami

Abstract

Up to 25% of ovulating women suffer from primary dysmenorrhea, a condition associated with pain and transient-reduced quality of life, along with greater irritability and impaired sleep. In the present study, we asked whether and if so to what extent melatonin and meloxicam can improve subjective and objective sleep and reduce pain among women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). To this end, we conducted a double-blind cross-over clinical trial lasting for three menstrual cycles. A total of 14 women (mean age M = 27.5 years) with primary dysmenorrhea took part in the study. At baseline, that is, during the first menstruation, they completed a visual analogue scale to rate pain; sleep continuity was assessed via actigraphs, and overall sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Next, participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions, either melatonin during the second, and meloxicam during the third menstruation, or meloxicam during the second, and melatonin during the third menstruation. Neither participants nor investigators were aware of participants' study assignment. During the second and third menstruations, the assessments described above were repeated. At baseline, sleep assessed both objectively and subjectively was impaired, and pain was high. Subjective sleep improved and pain decreased during the second and third menstruations irrespective of whether melatonin or meloxicam was administered first or second. Likewise, objective sleep efficiency increased and objective sleep latency shortened. The efficacy of melatonin was superior to that of meloxicam. The present pattern of results suggests that both melatonin and meloxicam are suitable to treat pain and PD-related sleep complaints among women with primary dysmenorrhea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 12 14%
Other 3 4%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 41 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Psychology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 42 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,282,386
of 24,875,365 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#636
of 998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,582
of 334,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.