↓ Skip to main content

Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: What is the problem?

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: What is the problem?
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2002
DOI 10.1007/s11948-002-0007-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J. Bird

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Social Sciences 3 11%
Computer Science 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,943,931
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#492
of 968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,087
of 133,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.