| Title |
Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-011-1858-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xavier Deffieux, Michèle Morin Surroca, Erika Faivre, Frédérique Pages, Hervé Fernandez, Amélie Gervaise |
| Abstract |
To evaluate various techniques for restoring tubal patency after sterilisation. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,856,604
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#535
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,869
of 108,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.