↓ Skip to main content

Tissue Engineering at the Micro-Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Tissue Engineering at the Micro-Scale
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, March 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1009949704750
Authors

Sangeeta N. Bhatia, Christopher S. Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Portugal 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 74 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 27%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Engineering 18 23%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2012.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#267
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,698
of 35,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.