| Title |
Treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma: Contemporary outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Urology Reports, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11934-004-0014-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Y. T. Chen, R. Ernest Sosa, Douglas S. Scherr |
| Abstract |
Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer that historically has been associated with poor outcome. Throughout the past decades, growing experience has allowed better understanding of the natural history and optimal management of this cancer. Advances in imaging and aggressive surgical therapy have raised the outlook for recently diagnosed patients. Further improvements in survival will require more effective systemic therapy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 75% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,696,673
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#135
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,275
of 133,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them