↓ Skip to main content

Clinical challenges of glioma and pregnancy: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Clinical challenges of glioma and pregnancy: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2851-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. van Westrhenen, J. T. Senders, E. Martin, A. C. DiRisio, M. L. D. Broekman

Abstract

This review aims to summarize challenges in clinical management of concomitant gliomas and pregnancy and provides suggestions for this management based on current literature. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies on glioma and pregnancy. Observational studies and articles describing expert opinions on clinical management were included. The strength of evidence was categorized as arguments from observational studies, consensus in expert opinions, or single expert opinions. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). 27 studies were selected, including 316 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 202) and known (n = 114) gliomas during pregnancy. The median sample size was 6 (range 1-65, interquartile range 1-9). Few recommendations originated from observational studies; the remaining arguments originated from consensus in expert opinions. Findings from observational studies of adequate quality include (1) There is no known effect of pregnancy on survival in low-grade glioma patients; (2) Pregnancy can provoke clinical deterioration and tumor growth on MRI; (3) In stable women at term, there is no benefit of cesarean section over vaginal delivery, with respect to adverse events in mother or child. Unanswered questions include when pregnancy should be discouraged, what best monitoring schedule is for both mother and fetus, and if and how chemo- and radiation therapy can be safely administered during pregnancy. A multicenter individual patient level meta-analysis collecting granular information on clinical management and related outcomes is needed to provide scientific evidence for clinical decision-making in pregnant glioma patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 49%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,377,126
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#401
of 3,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,152
of 344,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#11
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.