↓ Skip to main content

Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Disarming the gunslinger effect: Reaction beats intention for cooperative actions
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, April 2018
DOI 10.3758/s13423-018-1462-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Weller, Wilfried Kunde, Roland Pfister

Abstract

According to the famous physicist Niels Bohr, gunfights at high noon in Western movies not only captivate the cinema audience but also provide an accurate illustration of a psychophysical law. He suggested that willed actions come with slower movement execution than reactions, and therefore that a film's hero is able to get the upper hand even though the villain normally draws first. A corresponding "gunslinger effect" has been substantiated by empirical studies. Because these studies used a markedly competitive setting, however, it is currently unclear whether the gunslinger effect indeed reflects structural differences between willed actions and reactive movements, or whether it is a by-product of the competitive setting. To obtain bullet-proof evidence for a true reactive advantage, we investigated willed and reactive movements during a cooperative interaction of two participants. A pronounced reactive advantage emerged, indicating that two independent systems indeed control willed and reactive movements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 25%
Psychology 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%