↓ Skip to main content

Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
300 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
796 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling species distributions without using species distributions: the cane toad in Australia under current and future climates
Published in
Ecography, August 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05457.x
Authors

Michael Kearney, Ben L. Phillips, Christopher R. Tracy, Keith A. Christian, Gregory Betts, Warren P. Porter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 796 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 2%
Brazil 9 1%
Australia 7 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Portugal 5 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Other 28 4%
Unknown 708 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 188 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 22%
Student > Master 118 15%
Student > Bachelor 77 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 5%
Other 142 18%
Unknown 58 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 434 55%
Environmental Science 194 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 2%
Social Sciences 7 <1%
Other 47 6%
Unknown 83 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,206,523
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#667
of 2,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,850
of 93,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them