↓ Skip to main content

High-Frequency of Computer Tomography and Surgery for Abdominal Pain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
High-Frequency of Computer Tomography and Surgery for Abdominal Pain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Published in
Obesity Surgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-3223-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorunn Sandvik, Torstein Hole, Christian A. Klöckner, Bård E. Kulseng, Arne Wibe

Abstract

Acute, intermittent, and chronic abdominal pain is a common complaint after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of medical imaging and the need for surgery treating abdominal pain after RYGB in a cohort with long-term follow-up. Data from 569 patients who underwent RYGB as the primary bariatric procedure at a public hospital in Norway between April 2004 and June 2011 were prospectively registered in a local quality registry for bariatric surgery. All abdominal imaging and abdominal surgical procedures were registered until August 2017. Mean follow-up was 100 months (61-159). During the observation period, 22% had one CT, 9% had two CTs, 4% had three CTs, and 5% had four or more CTs for abdominal pain. Twenty-two percent underwent abdominal surgery, as 16% had one and 6% had two or more operations and gynecological procedures excluded. The purpose of operation was postoperative complications (1.4%), suspected internal herniation (9.3%), cholecystectomy (9.3%), appendectomy (2.3%), hernias (3.2%), and perforated ulcer in the gastrojejunal anastomosis (0.7%). Mean time interval was 42 ± 27 months from RYGB to cholecystectomy and 51 ± 26 months for suspected IH. With a mean follow-up period of more than 8 years after RYGB, 40% of the patients suffered from abdominal pain, needing one or more CT scans. The need for surgery treating suspected internal hernia and cholecystectomy was equal, at 9.3% for both procedures, but the mean time from RYGB to operation was shorter for cholecystectomies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#3,039
of 3,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,551
of 329,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#52
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.