↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of Reference Glasses for in-situ Analysis of Lithium and Boron

Overview of attention for article published in Microchimica Acta, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Preparation of Reference Glasses for in-situ Analysis of Lithium and Boron
Published in
Microchimica Acta, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00604-006-0541-x
Authors

Brieuc Le Fevre, Luisa Ottolini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 29%
Chemistry 2 29%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,553,524
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Microchimica Acta
#192
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,103
of 66,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microchimica Acta
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.