↓ Skip to main content

The Integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Findings from the EXPEDITION3 Trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 595)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The Integrated Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) Findings from the EXPEDITION3 Trial
Published in
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease, February 2018
DOI 10.14283/jpad.2018.10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alette M. Wessels, S. W. Andersen, S. A. Dowsett, E. R. Siemers

Abstract

The Integrated Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Rating Scale (iADRS) is a composite tool that combines scores from the AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) and the AD Cooperative Study - instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL). It demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties, and is effective in capturing both disease progression and separation of placebo and active drug effect. We assessed the performance of iADRS in the solanezumab EXPEDITION3 study, an 80-week, placebo-controlled study of individuals with mild AD dementia. A statistically significant difference between placebo and active drug was observed for iADRS score change from baseline at Week 28 (p=0.028) through Week 80 (p=0.015). Across the Phase 3 solanezumab trials, iADRS was the only tool that consistently differentiated between solanezumab and placebo groups. These findings suggest that the iADRS is a useful integrated measurement tool for treatment trials of individuals with mild AD dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 17 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 18 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#585,618
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
#27
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,515
of 344,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them