↓ Skip to main content

Robust multi-label transfer feature learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Robust multi-label transfer feature learning for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11682-018-9846-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Cheng, Mingxia Liu, Daoqiang Zhang, Dinggang Shen, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Transfer learning has been successfully used in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In these methods, data from one single or multiple related source domain(s) are employed to aid the learning task in the target domain. However, most of the existing methods utilize data from all source domains, ignoring the fact that unrelated source domains may degrade the learning performance. Also, previous studies assume that class labels for all subjects are reliable, without considering the ambiguity of class labels caused by slight differences between early AD patients and normal control subjects. To address these issues, we propose to transform the original binary class label of a particular subject into a multi-bit label coding vector with the aid of multiple source domains. We further develop a robust multi-label transfer feature learning (rMLTFL) model to simultaneously capture a common set of features from different domains (including the target domain and all source domains) and to identify the unrelated source domains. We evaluate our method on 406 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database with baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) data. The experimental results show that the proposed rMLTFL method can effectively improve the performance of AD diagnosis, compared with several state-of-the-art methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 33 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Psychology 6 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 38 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,274,073
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#186
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,770
of 330,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.