↓ Skip to main content

A common mechanism explains the induction of aerobic fermentation and adaptive antioxidant response in Phaffia rhodozyma

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
A common mechanism explains the induction of aerobic fermentation and adaptive antioxidant response in Phaffia rhodozyma
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12934-018-0898-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anahí Martínez-Cárdenas, Cipriano Chávez-Cabrera, Jazmín M. Vasquez-Bahena, Luis B. Flores-Cotera

Abstract

Growth conditions that bring about stress on Phaffia rhodozyma cells encourage the synthesis of astaxanthin, an antioxidant carotenoid, which protects cells against oxidative damage. Using P. rhodozyma cultures performed with and without copper limitation, we examined the kinetics of astaxanthin synthesis along with the expression of asy, the key astaxanthin synthesis gene, as well as aox, which encodes an alternative oxidase protein. Copper deficiency had a detrimental effect on the rates of oxygen consumption and ethanol reassimilation at the diauxic shift. In contrast, copper deficiency prompted alcoholic fermentation under aerobic conditions and had a favorable effect on the astaxanthin content of cells, as well as on aox expression. Both cultures exhibited strong aox expression while consuming ethanol, but particularly when copper was absent. We show that the induction of either astaxanthin production, aox expression, or aerobic fermentation exemplifies the crucial role that redox imbalance plays in triggering any of these phenomena. Based on our own results and data from others, we propose a mechanism that rationalizes the central role played by changes of respiratory activity, which lead to redox imbalances, in triggering both the short-term antioxidant response as well as fermentation in yeasts and other cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 26%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#1,377
of 1,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,539
of 329,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#33
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,615 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.