↓ Skip to main content

Phase model-based neuron stabilization into arbitrary clusters

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Phase model-based neuron stabilization into arbitrary clusters
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10827-018-0683-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy D. Matchen, Jeff Moehlis

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common method of combating pathological conditions associated with Parkinson's disease, Tourette syndrome, essential tremor, and other disorders, but whose mechanisms are not fully understood. One hypothesis, supported experimentally, is that some symptoms of these disorders are associated with pathological synchronization of neurons in the basal ganglia and thalamus. For this reason, there has been interest in recent years in finding efficient ways to desynchronize neurons that are both fast-acting and low-power. Recent results on coordinated reset and periodically forced oscillators suggest that forming distinct clusters of neurons may prove to be more effective than achieving complete desynchronization, in particular by promoting plasticity effects that might persist after stimulation is turned off. Current proposed methods for achieving clustering frequently require either multiple input sources or precomputing the control signal. We propose here a control strategy for clustering, based on an analysis of the reduced phase model for a set of identical neurons, that allows for real-time, single-input control of a population of neurons with low-amplitude, low total energy signals. After demonstrating its effectiveness on phase models, we apply it to full state models to demonstrate its validity. We also discuss the effects of coupling on the efficacy of the strategy proposed and demonstrate that the clustering can still be accomplished in the presence of weak to moderate electrotonic coupling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,480,611
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#267
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,539
of 329,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.