↓ Skip to main content

Androgen Replacement in Aging Men

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Androgen Replacement in Aging Men
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, September 2001
DOI 10.1007/s00223-001-1051-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

R.M. Francis

Abstract

Serum testosterone and estradiol decline with advancing age in men, but the contribution of these changes to age-related bone loss remains unclear. Most studies show a closer relationship between bone density and serum estradiol than with serum testosterone. Nevertheless, hypogonadism is widely considered to be an important cause of male osteoporosis, occurring in up to 20% of men with vertebral fractures and 50% with hip fractures. Bone loss in hypogonadal men has been attributed to androgen and estrogen deficiency, low 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations, malabsorption of calcium, and reduced circulating calcitonin. These abnormalities are corrected by testosterone replacement, which also decreases bone resorption and stimulates bone mineralization. Long-term testosterone replacement increases spine bone density by over 25%, although much of the improvement occurs in the first few years of treatment. There appears to be an inverse relationship between the basal serum testosterone and the increase in bone density observed with testosterone treatment, such that little change is seen in men with normal basal concentration. In contrast, an observational study in eugonadal men with vertebral fractures showed an increase in spine bone density of 5% after 6 months' treatment with testosterone, probably mediated by an increase in serum estradiol and a reduction in bone resorption. Although testosterone has beneficial effects on the skeleton, there may be adverse effects on the prostate and cardiovascular risk factors. Further studies are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of testosterone replacement in hypogonadal and eugonadal men with osteoporosis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,517,130
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#593
of 1,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,925
of 43,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.