↓ Skip to main content

The systematic value of nuclear genome size for “all” species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The systematic value of nuclear genome size for “all” species of Tulipa L. (Liliaceae)
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, July 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00606-009-0203-7
Authors

Ben J. M. Zonneveld

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 2 4%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,715
of 112,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.