↓ Skip to main content

On the period matrix of a Riemann surface of large genus (with an Appendix by J.H. Conway and N.J.A. Sloane)

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, December 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
On the period matrix of a Riemann surface of large genus (with an Appendix by J.H. Conway and N.J.A. Sloane)
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, December 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01232233
Authors

P. Buser, P. Sarnak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Netherlands 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 57%
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#203
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,002
of 76,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.