↓ Skip to main content

Scientific innovation in bibliographical databases: A comparative study of the science citation index and the pascal database

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, September 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Scientific innovation in bibliographical databases: A comparative study of the science citation index and the pascal database
Published in
Scientometrics, September 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf02019275
Authors

M. Jagodzinski-Sigogneau, S. Bauin, J. P. Courtial, H. Feillet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 36%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 18%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,311
of 2,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,816
of 16,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.