↓ Skip to main content

Particulate matter 2.5 damages skin cells by inducing oxidative stress, subcellular organelle dysfunction, and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Particulate matter 2.5 damages skin cells by inducing oxidative stress, subcellular organelle dysfunction, and apoptosis
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00204-018-2197-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mei Jing Piao, Mee Jung Ahn, Kyoung Ah Kang, Yea Seong Ryu, Yu Jae Hyun, Kristina Shilnikova, Ao Xuan Zhen, Jin Woo Jeong, Yung Hyun Choi, Hee Kyoung Kang, Young Sang Koh, Jin Won Hyun

Abstract

The skin is the largest organ of the human body and the one mostly exposed to outdoor contaminants. To evaluate the biological mechanisms underlying skin damage caused by fine particulate matter (PM2.5), we analyzed the effects of PM2.5 on cultured human keratinocytes and the skin of experimental animals. PM2.5 was applied to human HaCaT keratinocytes at 50 µg/mL for 24 h and to mouse skin at 100 µg/mL for 7 days. The results indicate that PM2.5 induced oxidative stress by generating reactive oxygen species both in vitro and in vivo, which led to DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and protein carbonylation. As a result, PM2.5 induced endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial swelling, and autophagy, and caused apoptosis in HaCaT cells and mouse skin tissue. The PM2.5-induced cell damage was attenuated by antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine, confirming that PM2.5 cellular toxicity was due to oxidative stress. These findings contribute to understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms triggered in the skin by PM2.5, among which oxidative stress may play a major role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 54 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Environmental Science 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 63 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,722,336
of 23,460,553 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#444
of 2,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,404
of 331,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,460,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.