↓ Skip to main content

A C‐terminally amidated analogue of ShK is a potent and selective blocker of the voltage‐gated potassium channel Kv1.3

Overview of attention for article published in Febs Letters, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A C‐terminally amidated analogue of ShK is a potent and selective blocker of the voltage‐gated potassium channel Kv1.3
Published in
Febs Letters, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.09.038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael W. Pennington, M. Harunur Rashid, Rajeev B. Tajhya, Christine Beeton, Serdar Kuyucak, Raymond S. Norton

Abstract

ShK, a 35-residue peptide from a sea anemone, is a potent blocker of potassium channels. Here we describe a new ShK analogue with an additional C-terminus Lys residue and amide. ShK-K-amide is a potent blocker of Kv1.3 and, in contrast to ShK and ShK-amide, is selective for Kv1.3. To understand this selectivity, we created complexes of ShK-K-amide with Kv1.3 and Kv1.1 using docking and molecular dynamics simulations, then performed umbrella sampling simulations to construct the potential of mean force of the ligand and calculate the corresponding binding free energy for the most stable configuration. The results agree well with experimental data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,802,284
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Febs Letters
#916
of 14,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,466
of 191,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Febs Letters
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.