| Title |
Gender-Differentiated Impacts of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Dam on Downstream Fishers in the Brazilian Amazon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Ecology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10745-018-9992-z |
| Authors |
Laura Castro-Diaz, Maria Claudia Lopez, Emilio Moran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,167,942
of 24,288,381 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#50
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,622
of 333,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.