↓ Skip to main content

Prehistoric nearshore and littoral fishing in the eastern Tropical Pacific: An ichthyological evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of World Prehistory, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Prehistoric nearshore and littoral fishing in the eastern Tropical Pacific: An ichthyological evaluation
Published in
Journal of World Prehistory, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00997584
Authors

Richard Cooke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 2 5%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Social Sciences 12 29%
Arts and Humanities 4 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2008.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Journal of World Prehistory
#104
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,408
of 18,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of World Prehistory
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them