↓ Skip to main content

Discovering Drugs for the Treatment of Ebola Virus

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 112)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
46 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Discovering Drugs for the Treatment of Ebola Virus
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40506-017-0130-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra L. Bixler, Allen J. Duplantier, Sina Bavari

Abstract

Ebola virus, a member of the Filoviridae family, is a causative agent of severe viral hemorrhagic fever in humans. Over the past 40 years, the virus has been linked to several high mortality outbreaks in Africa with the recent West African outbreak resulting in over 11,000 deaths. This review provides a summary of the status of the drug discovery and development process for therapeutics for Ebola virus disease, with a focus on the strategies being used and the challenges facing each stage of the process. Despite the wealth of in vitro efficacy data, preclinical data in animal models, and human clinical data, no therapeutics have been approved for the treatment of Ebola virus disease. However, several promising candidates, such as ZMapp and GS-5734, have advanced into ongoing clinical trials. The gravity of the 2014-2016 outbreak spurred a heightened effort to identify and develop new treatments for Ebola virus disease, including small molecules, immunotherapeutics, host factors, and clinical disease management options. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endoresed by the U.S. Army.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 26 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2024.
All research outputs
#594,177
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases
#1
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,277
of 328,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them