| Title |
A TRIBUTE TO DR. THEODORE T. PUCK (September 24, 1916November 6, 2005)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1290/0606039a.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip I Marcus, Gordon H Sato, Richard G Ham, David Patterson |
| Abstract |
Dr. Theodore T. Puck, a pioneer in mammalian cell culture, somatic cell genetics, and the study of human genetic diseases, passed away in 2005. In tribute to Dr. Puck, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Animal presents invited remembrances from four colleagues whose associations with Dr. Puck spanned 51 years. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#176
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,328
of 174,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.